- Topic
68k Popularity
39k Popularity
36k Popularity
31k Popularity
78k Popularity
- Pin
- 🎉 The #CandyDrop Futures Challenge# is live — join now to share a 6 BTC prize pool!
📢 Post your futures trading experience on Gate Square with the event hashtag — $25 × 20 rewards are waiting!
🎁 $500 in futures trial vouchers up for grabs — 20 standout posts will win!
📅 Event Period: August 1, 2025, 15:00 – August 15, 2025, 19:00 (UTC+8)
👉 Event Link: https://www.gate.com/candy-drop/detail/BTC-98
Dare to trade. Dare to win. - 📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #WXTM Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Celebrate CandyDrop Round 59 featuring MinoTari (WXTM) — compete for a 70,000 WXTM prize pool!
🎯 About MinoTari (WXTM)
Tari is a Rust-based blockchain protocol centered around digital assets.
It empowers creators to build new types of digital experiences and narratives.
With Tari, digitally scarce assets—like collectibles or in-game items—unlock new business opportunities for creators.
🎨 Event Period:
Aug 7, 2025, 09:00 – Aug 12, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate:
Post original content on Gate Square related to WXTM or its
EIP3074 has been replaced by EIP7702, revealing the deep games of governance in Ethereum.
The Controversy between EIP3074 and EIP7702: The Deep Game of Ethereum Governance
Recently, the Ethereum community has engaged in intense discussions regarding the account abstraction proposal in the Pectra upgrade. The originally planned EIP3074 proposal faced strong opposition from the ERC4337 team and was ultimately replaced by EIP7702 proposed by Vitalik. This controversy reflects some deep-seated issues in Ethereum governance.
Comparison of EIP3074 and EIP7702
EIP3074 introduces two opcodes, AUTH and AUTHCALL, allowing users to delegate their accounts for use by smart contracts, enabling functions such as gas payment and batch transactions. However, it has some security vulnerabilities, such as the potential for signature replay attacks.
EIP7702 introduces a new type of transaction that allows EOA to add smart contract functionality, aligning more closely with the goals of account abstraction. It can directly utilize existing account abstraction infrastructure, making it more compatible with ERC4337.
Governance Process Review
EIP3074 has been discussed in core developer meetings since 2021, undergoing multiple rounds of revisions. However, the ERC4337 team has consistently opposed it, believing that there are security risks.
Until May 2024, Vitalik proposed EIP7702 90 minutes before the meeting, and the core developers quickly reached a consensus to replace EIP3074 with it. This decision-making process sparked some controversy.
In-depth Cause Analysis
This controversy reflects the VVRC model of Ethereum governance:
EIP7702 is more in line with Vitalik's envisioned roadmap for account abstraction, while EIP3074 deviates from it. When significant disagreements arise, Vitalik's personal opinion often has the final say.
This event highlights the importance of vision and roadmap in Ethereum governance, as well as the need for better communication and coordination among all parties in the community to jointly promote the development of Ethereum.